Just to give you only two examples which speak louder than words, where our political leaders heart really is on the issue, with so much money at stake. In 1995, Florida businessman, David Reynard, filed a law suit against the cellular phone industry following his wife’s death from a brain tumor that she developed very close to the site of her physical contact with a cell phone. She was only 33 years old.

There was also sufficient scientific evidence implicating the link between cell phone use and brain tumors. Following the media exposure of this case, including the “Larry King Live” show, cell phone companies stocks value crashed, which prompted the industry’s urgent crisis intervention campaign. One of its chief representatives, Thomas Wheeler, then President of the Washington, D.C.-based wireless trade group, known today a CITA – Wireless Association, made a rather stunningly reassuring statement at a press conference. There, he stated that no less than 10,000 scientific research studies have proven the safety of microwave radiation emitted by cell phones.

But even while media in its usual haste to reassure the public with such an impressive research has widely spread this reassurance, the real facts were that the exact number of such studies was zero… It was simply because they did not even exist!

The ‘minor’ mistake here was that Mr. Wheeler happened to quote studies which concerned… microwave kitchen ovens, either due to outright lying out of desperation, or being simply completely incompetent to know the difference between microwave cell phone technology and microwave kitchen ovens.

Yet, in spite of someone like Mr. Wheeler not instilling in us the greatest trust, whether with his integrity or competence, he was nevertheless, nominated, years later in 2013, by the President of the United States for such a responsible position as the head of the FDA which entails handling health issues of 330 million Americans. The main reasons for this nomination seemed to be the industry connections and political campaign contributions to ‘the right people’ in Washington.

As long ago as in 1990, the EPA’s office of Health & Environmental Assessment had already drafted a recommendation that based on voluminous and credible scientific data the American public had to be warned about EMFs as being ‘probable human carcinogen’. However, after some invisible forces poked at this draft, through legitimate governmental committees and subcommittees, the term ‘probable human carcinogen’ was nowhere to be found, and new and reassuring words (all without a shred of scientific evidence) such as ‘inappropriate EMF-cancer link’ appeared. The main ‘argument’ for this replacement or deceit was that ‘we cannot acknowledge EMF-cancer link because we don’t completely understand how EMFs cause cancer’, which represents a complete absurdity from the point of view of the rules of science.

However, science lacks detailed understanding of many phenomena in nature, including even better understood law of gravity, but does this mean, per se, that there is anything wrong with warning people not to jump down from a fifth story building window? Or don’t we have plenty of warning signs around high power lines or electric transformers – keep away – even though the exact mechanism of electricity has not been fully understood, yet. So, if 50 years from now, science still cannot fully explain the EMF-cancer link, but its existence has been well-documented, we would rather see our children and adults dying from cancer, instead of warning them about the danger?! Furthermore, even the ‘servants of the people’ or the US Senate itself got involved to tell the EPA to stay away from the EMF-cancer link, and, ‘as it just so happens’, it has cut the EPA’s budget for that year.

So, the bottom line, we can buy and use anything we wish – phones, PCs, laptops, iPads, TVs, any electronic gadgets – but no one in a store, online, or at work will warn us about brain and other tumors, and crippling diseases that these electronics may easily cause us to have. We may say, “How come there are so much scientific confirmations to these, even in the thousands of scientific studies?” But, the harsh reality is, that there is not a single law that exists in the books that can force anyone to do anything, even if with tens of thousands of positive studies. All we know is that there is the best well-known recipe in science, in business, or politics, that when being confronted with hardcore scientific evidence or inconvenient truth, the best and politically correct way to handle this is not by saying, “Oh, we really don’t care for the sake of profits or liability,” but instead, by saying simply, “Ah, we are very concerned but we just need more scientific studies to confirm this, before we can responsibly act.” They know well that once the latter phrase was uttered, one looks very responsible and professional, yet, not having to move a finger, while waiting for more studies. And since there is no law that defines how many studies is enough, this circus with needing and waiting for more studies, with the complete blessings of our healthcare governmental agencies, will keep going on forever.

So, the stark bottom line remains the same – we are on our own – or as a good Russian saying reflects upon common situations like this, “The task of rescuing drowning citizens lays in the hands of the drowning citizens themselves!”

So, it is obvious that this is one of those cold-blooded facts which we have no choice but to face and do our best to survive amidst this electromagnetic onslaught.

For unsolicited testimonials concerning the health benefits of Memon technology,
refer to this page: yourserenityinc.com/why-memon.